Loading…
Two Value funds side by side: returns, costs, size, risk and how much their portfolios overlap.
Nippon India Value Fund vs ICICI Prudential Value Fund, as of 9 Nov 2026: Nippon India Value Fund NAV ₹242.65, 3Y CAGR 13.1%, expense ratio 1.26%; ICICI Prudential Value Fund NAV ₹522.08, 3Y CAGR 13.5%, expense ratio 1.08%; about 36% of their portfolios overlap.
As of · Source: AMFI NAVs and fund-house disclosures
| Nippon India Value Fund Direct Growth | ICICI Prudential Value Fund Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon India Mutual Fund | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund |
| Plan | Direct Plan · Growth Option | Direct Plan · Growth |
| NAV | ₹242.65 (9 Nov 2026) | ₹522.08 (9 Nov 2026) |
| 1Y return | −4.2% | −1.9% |
| 3Y CAGR | 13.1% | 13.5% |
| 5Y CAGR | 12.1% | 14.0% |
| Since launch (CAGR) | 15.1% | 17.1% |
| Expense ratio | 1.26% | 1.08% |
| AUM | ₹8,693 cr | ₹61,122 cr |
| Risk-o-meter | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| Exit load | 10% of the units allotted shall be redeemed without any exit load, on or before completion of 12 months from the date of allotment of units. Any redemption in excess of such limit in the first 12 months from the date of allotment shall be subject to the following exit load, Redemption of units would be done on First… | Entry Load - Not Applicable Exit Load - a) 1% of the applicable Net Asset Value - if the amount sought to be redeemed or switch out is invested for a period of upto 12 months from the date of allotment, b) Nil - if the amount sought to be redeemed or switch out is invested for a period more than 12 months from the… |
| Minimum SIP | ₹100 | ₹100 |
| Holdings | 85 | 65 |
| Top 10 holdings weight | 35.9% | 51.2% |
| Portfolio overlap | About 36% by weight, from the latest disclosed holdings | |
Returns are point-to-point for each plan, after its expense ratio; periods over one year are CAGR. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Open in the compare tool: growth charts, SIP outcomes and shared holdings →ICICI Prudential Value Fund has the higher 5-year CAGR (as of 9 Nov 2026): Nippon India Value Fund 12.1% a year vs ICICI Prudential Value Fund 14.0% a year. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
ICICI Prudential Value Fund costs less: Nippon India Value Fund charges 1.26% a year and ICICI Prudential Value Fund 1.08% a year.
ICICI Prudential Value Fund is larger: Nippon India Value Fund manages ₹8,693 cr and ICICI Prudential Value Fund ₹61,122 cr (as of 9 Nov 2026).
About 36% of their portfolios overlap by weight (the smaller weight of each common holding, summed), from the latest disclosed holdings.
Both are rated "Very High" on SEBI's risk-o-meter.
We don't give recommendations. Jivani Markets is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser or research analyst. Whether a fund suits you depends on your goals, horizon and risk appetite; speak to a SEBI-registered investment adviser or an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor before investing.
Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Returns are for Direct plans, after expenses (TER is already in the NAV). Research, not advice: we do not say a fund suits you. Disclaimer