Loading…
Two International funds side by side: returns, costs, size, risk and how much their portfolios overlap.
Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund vs HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF, as of 6 Nov 2026: Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund NAV ₹60.69, 3Y CAGR 17.8%, expense ratio 0.75%; HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF NAV ₹20.81, 3Y CAGR 24.0%, expense ratio 0.21%; about 0% of their portfolios overlap.
As of · Source: AMFI NAVs and fund-house disclosures
| Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund Direct Growth | HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | International | International |
| Fund house | Edelweiss Mutual Fund | HDFC Mutual Fund |
| Plan | Direct Plan · Growth | — |
| NAV | ₹60.69 (6 Nov 2026) | ₹20.81 (6 Nov 2026) |
| 1Y return | 2.7% | 17.1% |
| 3Y CAGR | 17.8% | 24.0% |
| 5Y CAGR | 2.4% | 14.5% |
| Since launch (CAGR) | 11.3% | 15.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.21% |
| AUM | ₹2,507 cr | ₹1,725 cr |
| Risk-o-meter | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | MSCI Golden Dragon Index | — |
| Exit load | Entry Load - NIL. Exit Load - Within 12 months from the date of allotment in respect of purchase made other than through SIP - 1%. Within 24 months from the date of allotment in respect of first purchase made through SIP - 1% | Entry/Sales Load: NA Exit Load: ? Exit Load of 1. 00% is payable if Units are redeemed/switched-out within 30 days from the date of allotment of units. ? No Exit Load is payable if Units are redeemed/switched-out after 30 days from the date of allotment. |
| Minimum SIP | ₹100 | — |
| Holdings | 2 | 5 |
| Top 10 holdings weight | 97.8% | — |
| Portfolio overlap | About 0% by weight, from the latest disclosed holdings | |
Returns are point-to-point for each plan, after its expense ratio; periods over one year are CAGR. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Open in the compare tool: growth charts, SIP outcomes and shared holdings →HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF has the higher 5-year CAGR (as of 6 Nov 2026): Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund 2.4% a year vs HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF 14.5% a year. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF costs less: Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund charges 0.75% a year and HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF 0.21% a year.
Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund is larger: Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund manages ₹2,507 cr and HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF ₹1,725 cr (as of 6 Nov 2026).
About 0% of their portfolios overlap by weight (the smaller weight of each common holding, summed), from the latest disclosed holdings.
Both are rated "Very High" on SEBI's risk-o-meter.
We don't give recommendations. Jivani Markets is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser or research analyst. Whether a fund suits you depends on your goals, horizon and risk appetite; speak to a SEBI-registered investment adviser or an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor before investing.
Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Returns are for Direct plans, after expenses (TER is already in the NAV). Research, not advice: we do not say a fund suits you. Disclaimer