Lerthai Finance (BSE 502250)₹429.00+4.89%Other Construction Materials
Lerthai Finance is compared with the 10 closest in size in Other Construction Materials (28 companies in the industry). It has a ROCE of −4.0% against a peer median of 2.4%. By market cap it is #4 of 11 in this set.
As of · Peer set: 10 closest in size in Other Construction Materials
| Company | M-cap (₹ Cr) | P/E | ROCE % | ROE % | Debt / equity | Div. yield % | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net profit (₹ Cr) | Qtr sales growth % | Qtr profit growth % | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divyashakti | 69 | 230.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 3.0 | 35 | 1 | −46.3 | −78.7 | vs BSE 502250 |
| Ravi Leela Granites | 61 | 6.8 | 20.9 | 58.3 | 2.65 | 0.0 | 57 | 10 | 50.6 | −27.7 | vs BSE 502250 |
| Associated Ceramics | 36 | 17.9 | 9.8 | 8.4 | 0.12 | 0.0 | 44 | 2 | −18.0 | −176.9 | vs BSE 502250 |
| Lerthai Finance | 30 | — | −4.0 | −4.3 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0 | −0 | — | — | — |
| Mcon Rasayan India | 28 | 9.3 | 11.0 | 8.7 | 0.50 | 0.0 | 65 | 3 | 26.4 | 75.7 | vs BSE 502250 |
| Jai Mata Glass | 27 | — | −10.4 | −10.9 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0 | −0 | −75.0 | −600.0 | vs BSE 502250 |
| Neelkanth Rockminerals | 25 | 103.8 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | −34.2 | vs BSE 502250 |
| Shiva Granito Export | 24 | — | 1.6 | −0.2 | 0.17 | 0.0 | 12 | −0 | 41.1 | −450.0 | vs BSE 502250 |
| Inani Marbles & Industries | 18 | 108.4 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.39 | 0.4 | 47 | 0 | −6.0 | — | vs BSE 502250 |
| Solid Stone Company | 13 | 28.4 | 7.1 | 2.2 | 0.82 | 0.0 | 26 | 0 | −2.9 | −45.5 | vs BSE 502250 |
| Triveni Glass | 12 | — | −20.3 | — | — | 0.0 | 0 | −1 | — | — | vs BSE 502250 |
| Peer median | 27 | 28.4 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.14 | 0.0 | 26 | 0 | −4.4 | −62.1 |
Listed companies closest to Lerthai Finance in Other Construction Materials include Divyashakti, Ravi Leela Granites, Associated Ceramics, Mcon Rasayan India, Jai Mata Glass, Neelkanth Rockminerals, Shiva Granito Export, Inani Marbles & Industries.
Divyashakti, with a market cap of ₹68.69 Cr.
Lerthai Finance's return on capital employed is −4.0%, below the peer median of 2.4%.