Shiva Suitings (BSE 521003)₹47.000.00%Trading & Distributors
Shiva Suitings is compared with the 10 closest in size in Trading & Distributors (201 companies in the industry). It has a ROCE of −5.9% against a peer median of 0.1%, and latest-quarter sales growth of −56.8% against a peer median of −19.1%. By market cap it is #4 of 11 in this set.
As of · Peer set: 10 closest in size in Trading & Distributors
| Company | M-cap (₹ Cr) | P/E | ROCE % | ROE % | Debt / equity | Div. yield % | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net profit (₹ Cr) | Qtr sales growth % | Qtr profit growth % | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker Agrochem Exports | 8 | 8.9 | 23.1 | 20.0 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 5 | 1 | −88.1 | 112.5 | vs BSE 521003 |
| Mystic Electronics | 8 | 13.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | vs BSE 521003 |
| Kalpa Commercial | 8 | 8.0 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 3.28 | 0.0 | 31 | 1 | 63.0 | 250.0 | vs BSE 521003 |
| Shiva Suitings | 8 | — | −5.9 | −4.4 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1 | −0 | −56.8 | — | — |
| Hemo Organic | 7 | — | −23.9 | — | 21.08 | 0.0 | 1 | −1 | — | — | vs BSE 521003 |
| Devine Impex | 7 | 256.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | −19.1 | — | vs BSE 521003 |
| Fraser and Company | 7 | — | −10.7 | −12.3 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 1 | −1 | — | — | vs BSE 521003 |
| Siddheswari Garments | 7 | — | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 33.3 | vs BSE 521003 |
| Grandma Trading & Agencies | 7 | 27.0 | −29.7 | −200.0 | 3.70 | 0.0 | 1 | −0 | 550.0 | — | vs BSE 521003 |
| Risa International | 7 | — | −20.8 | — | — | 0.0 | 0 | −1 | — | — | vs BSE 521003 |
| Ganon Products | 7 | 14.1 | 12.4 | 4.6 | 0.95 | 0.0 | 7 | 1 | — | 200.0 | vs BSE 521003 |
| Peer median | 7 | 13.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.08 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | −19.1 | 156.3 |
Listed companies closest to Shiva Suitings in Trading & Distributors include Parker Agrochem Exports, Mystic Electronics, Kalpa Commercial, Hemo Organic, Devine Impex, Fraser and Company, Siddheswari Garments, Grandma Trading & Agencies.
Parker Agrochem Exports, with a market cap of ₹7.68 Cr.
Shiva Suitings' return on capital employed is −5.9%, below the peer median of 0.1%.