Loading…
RRP Defense (BSE 530929)₹584.75−1.00%Trading & Distributors
RRP Defense is compared with the 10 closest in size in Trading & Distributors (201 companies in the industry). It has a ROCE of −10.7% against a peer median of 4.0%. By market cap it is #3 of 11 in this set.
As of · Peer set: 10 closest in size in Trading & Distributors
| Company | M-cap (₹ Cr) | P/E | ROCE % | ROE % | Debt / equity | Div. yield % | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net profit (₹ Cr) | Qtr sales growth % | Qtr profit growth % | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BN Agrochem | 1,372 | 81.7 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 0.11 | 0.0 | 871 | 34 | 26.7 | −85.2 | vs BSE 530929 |
| Pervasive Commodities | 1,140 | — | 0.0 | −0.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 43 | −0 | 153.9 | — | vs BSE 530929 |
| RRP Defense | 803 | — | −10.7 | −13.5 | 0.20 | 0.0 | 12 | −1 | — | — | — |
| Yamuna Syndicate | 779 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 0.00 | 2.0 | 69 | 52 | 16.6 | 29.2 | vs BSE 530929 |
| Shiv Aum Steels | 754 | 79.1 | 8.0 | 6.1 | 0.80 | 0.0 | 574 | 7 | 25.4 | 148.7 | vs BSE 530929 |
| The State Trading Corporation of India | 623 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 17.4 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0 | 647 | — | −71.0 | vs BSE 530929 |
| HP Telecom India | 606 | 23.8 | 20.0 | 28.8 | 1.69 | 0.0 | 2,385 | 25 | 40.9 | 157.0 | vs BSE 530929 |
| Arvaya Healthcare | 528 | 687.5 | — | — | — | 0.0 | 9 | 1 | — | — | vs BSE 530929 |
| Oswal Agro Mills | 524 | — | 2.0 | −2.0 | 0.00 | 1.3 | 19 | −22 | −100.0 | −70.6 | vs BSE 530929 |
| Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols | 485 | — | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.19 | 0.4 | 235 | −12 | −41.9 | −62.5 | vs BSE 530929 |
| SMT Engineering | 485 | 19.1 | 25.0 | 25.2 | 0.69 | 0.0 | 163 | 23 | 14.0 | 61.9 | vs BSE 530929 |
| Peer median | 623 | 23.8 | 4.0 | 5.1 | 0.15 | 0.0 | 69 | 7 | 21.0 | −16.7 |
Listed companies closest to RRP Defense in Trading & Distributors include BN Agrochem, Pervasive Commodities, Yamuna Syndicate, Shiv Aum Steels, The State Trading Corporation of India, HP Telecom India, Arvaya Healthcare, Oswal Agro Mills.
BN Agrochem, with a market cap of ₹1,372 Cr.
RRP Defense's return on capital employed is −10.7%, below the peer median of 4.0%.