Loading…
Unipro Technolgy (BSE 540189)₹9.61−4.95%IT Enabled Services
Unipro Technolgy is compared with the 10 closest in size in IT Enabled Services (115 companies in the industry). It has a ROCE of −27.2% against a peer median of 1.2%. By market cap it is #9 of 11 in this set.
As of · Peer set: 10 closest in size in IT Enabled Services
| Company | M-cap (₹ Cr) | P/E | ROCE % | ROE % | Debt / equity | Div. yield % | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net profit (₹ Cr) | Qtr sales growth % | Qtr profit growth % | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quadpro Ites | 20 | 133.3 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 6 | 0 | −10.6 | −112.0 | vs BSE 540189 |
| Globesecure Technologies | 17 | — | 1.2 | −0.6 | 0.15 | 0.0 | 21 | −0 | 100.8 | — | vs BSE 540189 |
| 3C IT Solutions & Telecoms (India) | 13 | 21.6 | 5.2 | 4.5 | 0.03 | 0.0 | 58 | 1 | 186.3 | 266.7 | vs BSE 540189 |
| United Interactive | 11 | 22.3 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | — | 30.0 | vs BSE 540189 |
| Panabyte Technologies | 10 | 60.8 | 7.4 | 2.8 | 0.46 | 0.0 | 9 | 0 | 37.0 | — | vs BSE 540189 |
| Euphoria Infotech (India) | 8 | 5.1 | 12.9 | 9.1 | 0.29 | 0.0 | 15 | 2 | 42.4 | 7.2 | vs BSE 540189 |
| I Power Solutions India | 8 | — | −20.7 | −27.3 | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0 | −1 | — | — | vs BSE 540189 |
| Ace Engitech | 6 | — | −147.7 | — | 0.12 | 0.0 | 0 | −0 | — | — | vs BSE 540189 |
| Unipro Technolgy | 6 | — | −27.2 | — | — | 0.0 | 1 | −0 | — | 700.0 | — |
| Ekennis Software Service | 5 | — | −10.0 | −34.8 | 1.51 | 0.0 | 2 | −1 | −37.3 | — | vs BSE 540189 |
| Bharatiya Global Infomedia | 5 | 1.6 | −1.0 | 3.5 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | 3 | — | — | vs BSE 540189 |
| Peer median | 8 | 21.9 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | 39.7 | 30.0 |
Listed companies closest to Unipro Technolgy in IT Enabled Services include Quadpro Ites, Globesecure Technologies, 3C IT Solutions & Telecoms (India), United Interactive, Panabyte Technologies, Euphoria Infotech (India), I Power Solutions India, Ace Engitech.
Quadpro Ites, with a market cap of ₹20.20 Cr.
Unipro Technolgy's return on capital employed is −27.2%, below the peer median of 1.2%.