Educomp Solutions (EDUCOMP)₹0.8700−2.25%Education
Educomp Solutions is compared with the 10 closest in size in Education (29 companies in the industry). It has a ROCE of −83.1% against a peer median of −0.5%, and latest-quarter sales growth of −25.4% against a peer median of −24.5%. By market cap it is #9 of 11 in this set.
As of · Peer set: 10 closest in size in Education
| Company | M-cap (₹ Cr) | P/E | ROCE % | ROE % | Debt / equity | Div. yield % | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net profit (₹ Cr) | Qtr sales growth % | Qtr profit growth % | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascensive Educare | 65 | 18.8 | 24.5 | 20.3 | 0.41 | 0.0 | 59 | 3 | 37.7 | −41.5 | vs EDUCOMP |
| Vantage Knowledge Academy | 34 | — | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.00 | 3.4 | 2 | 0 | −89.9 | — | vs EDUCOMP |
| Tree House Education & Accessories | 29 | — | −6.9 | −5.4 | 0.04 | 0.0 | 4 | −10 | 0.0 | — | vs EDUCOMP |
| Virtual Global Education | 25 | — | −0.5 | −0.5 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 0 | −0 | — | — | vs EDUCOMP |
| Virtual Global Education | 24 | — | −0.5 | −0.5 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 0 | −0 | — | — | vs EDUCOMP |
| DSJ Keep Learning | 23 | — | −11.1 | −14.6 | 0.27 | 0.0 | 8 | −1 | −54.8 | — | vs EDUCOMP |
| Humming Bird Education | 17 | 30.8 | 31.2 | 21.3 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 8 | 1 | 109.4 | — | vs EDUCOMP |
| MT Educare | 12 | — | 2.1 | — | — | 0.0 | 36 | −3 | −23.5 | — | vs EDUCOMP |
| Educomp Solutions | 11 | — | −83.1 | — | — | 0.0 | 4 | −32 | −25.4 | — | — |
| Kuberan Global Edu Solutions | 7 | — | −19.8 | −20.2 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0 | −0 | −100.0 | — | vs EDUCOMP |
| ACE EduTremd | 3 | — | −1.3 | −2.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0 | −0 | — | — | vs EDUCOMP |
| Peer median | 23 | 24.8 | −0.5 | −0.5 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 4 | −0 | −24.5 | −41.5 |
Listed companies closest to Educomp Solutions in Education include Ascensive Educare, Vantage Knowledge Academy, Tree House Education & Accessories, Virtual Global Education, Virtual Global Education, DSJ Keep Learning, Humming Bird Education, MT Educare.
Ascensive Educare, with a market cap of ₹64.62 Cr.
Educomp Solutions' return on capital employed is −83.1%, below the peer median of −0.5%.