Laxmi Cotspin (LAXMICOT)₹12.35−0.72%Other Textile Products
Laxmi Cotspin is compared with the 10 closest in size in Other Textile Products (289 companies in the industry). It has a ROCE of 2.0% against a peer median of 7.0%, and latest-quarter sales growth of −63.9% against a peer median of 4.7%. By market cap it is #8 of 11 in this set.
As of · Peer set: 10 closest in size in Other Textile Products
| Company | M-cap (₹ Cr) | P/E | ROCE % | ROE % | Debt / equity | Div. yield % | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net profit (₹ Cr) | Qtr sales growth % | Qtr profit growth % | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Cotfab | 22 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 7.1 | 1.02 | 0.0 | 155 | 4 | 27.0 | 0.0 | vs LAXMICOT |
| K K Silk Mills | 22 | 4.6 | 11.0 | 8.7 | 0.80 | 0.0 | 245 | 5 | 13.4 | −33.4 | vs LAXMICOT |
| Indo Cotspin | 22 | — | 1.2 | −0.1 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 25 | 0 | 4.7 | — | vs LAXMICOT |
| Skybiotech Healthcare | 22 | — | −9.2 | −13.2 | 1.05 | 0.0 | 7 | −1 | −79.8 | — | vs LAXMICOT |
| Mahalaxmi Fabric Mills | 22 | — | 7.0 | 5.4 | 0.79 | 0.0 | 135 | 0 | −8.2 | −98.8 | vs LAXMICOT |
| Shree Bhavya Fabrics | 22 | 9.7 | 9.0 | 6.3 | 1.83 | 0.0 | 163 | 2 | −9.2 | −27.0 | vs LAXMICOT |
| Anirit Ventures | 21 | — | −28.1 | −141.0 | 0.44 | 0.0 | 0 | −5 | — | — | vs LAXMICOT |
| Laxmi Cotspin | 21 | — | 2.0 | −3.1 | 0.71 | 0.0 | 152 | −1 | −63.9 | −132.6 | — |
| Uniroyal Industries | 21 | 86.2 | 2.0 | −3.6 | 0.71 | 0.0 | 111 | −1 | 38.8 | — | vs LAXMICOT |
| Panchatv Bharat | 20 | 3.5 | 30.3 | 37.2 | 1.11 | 0.0 | 57 | 4 | — | — | vs LAXMICOT |
| Padam Cotton Yarns | 20 | 1.9 | 47.0 | 35.4 | 0.01 | 14.1 | 73 | 11 | 86.3 | 91.2 | vs LAXMICOT |
| Peer median | 22 | 5.3 | 7.0 | 5.4 | 0.79 | 0.0 | 111 | 0 | 4.7 | −30.2 |
Listed companies closest to Laxmi Cotspin in Other Textile Products include United Cotfab, K K Silk Mills, Indo Cotspin, Skybiotech Healthcare, Mahalaxmi Fabric Mills, Shree Bhavya Fabrics, Anirit Ventures, Uniroyal Industries.
United Cotfab, with a market cap of ₹22.45 Cr.
Laxmi Cotspin's return on capital employed is 2.0%, below the peer median of 7.0%.