Loading…
Pearl Polymers (PEARLPOLY)₹15.40−1.60%Plastic Products - Consumer
Pearl Polymers is compared with the 9 closest in size in Plastic Products - Consumer (14 companies in the industry). It has a ROCE of −15.7% against a peer median of 7.9%, and latest-quarter sales growth of −10.3% against a peer median of −10.6%. By market cap it is #8 of 10 in this set.
As of · Peer set: 9 closest in size in Plastic Products - Consumer
| Company | M-cap (₹ Cr) | P/E | ROCE % | ROE % | Debt / equity | Div. yield % | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net profit (₹ Cr) | Qtr sales growth % | Qtr profit growth % | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bai-Kakaji Polymers | 576 | 21.4 | 18.3 | 13.9 | 0.37 | 0.0 | 364 | 27 | — | — | vs PEARLPOLY |
| Essen Speciality Films | 285 | — | −1.0 | −2.7 | 0.32 | 0.9 | 162 | −4 | −23.1 | −79.3 | vs PEARLPOLY |
| Atharva Poly-Plast | 253 | 28.7 | 35.9 | 49.6 | 0.61 | 0.0 | 54 | 6 | — | — | vs PEARLPOLY |
| PIL ITALICA LIFESTYLE | 170 | 40.3 | 8.0 | 5.1 | 0.18 | 0.0 | 107 | 4 | −30.5 | −87.2 | vs PEARLPOLY |
| Prima Plastics | 135 | 6.9 | 14.0 | 10.8 | 0.15 | 1.6 | 160 | 21 | 15.2 | −0.9 | vs PEARLPOLY |
| Tokyo Plast International | 73 | 226.8 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 0.76 | 0.0 | 79 | 1 | 8.8 | −333.3 | vs PEARLPOLY |
| AVRO INDIA | 72 | 15.2 | 7.3 | 5.2 | 0.20 | 0.0 | 95 | 5 | 16.9 | −34.6 | vs PEARLPOLY |
| Pearl Polymers | 26 | — | −15.7 | −15.4 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 20 | −5 | −10.3 | — | — |
| Niraj Ispat Industries | 13 | 8.0 | 11.4 | 10.8 | 0.29 | 0.0 | 4 | 2 | −10.9 | 37.9 | vs PEARLPOLY |
| Technopack Polymers | 12 | 9.7 | 7.8 | 5.9 | 0.13 | 0.0 | 9 | 1 | −44.2 | −6.8 | vs PEARLPOLY |
| Peer median | 104 | 18.3 | 7.9 | 5.5 | 0.24 | 0.0 | 87 | 3 | −10.6 | −34.6 |
Listed companies closest to Pearl Polymers in Plastic Products - Consumer include Bai-Kakaji Polymers, Essen Speciality Films, Atharva Poly-Plast, PIL ITALICA LIFESTYLE, Prima Plastics, Tokyo Plast International, AVRO INDIA, Niraj Ispat Industries.
Bai-Kakaji Polymers, with a market cap of ₹576 Cr.
Pearl Polymers' return on capital employed is −15.7%, below the peer median of 7.9%.