Loading…
Tijaria Polypipes (TIJARIA)₹6.37+1.92%Plastic Products - Industrial
Tijaria Polypipes is compared with the 10 closest in size in Plastic Products - Industrial (82 companies in the industry). It has a ROCE of −1.9% against a peer median of 3.5%. By market cap it is #5 of 11 in this set.
As of · Peer set: 10 closest in size in Plastic Products - Industrial
| Company | M-cap (₹ Cr) | P/E | ROCE % | ROE % | Debt / equity | Div. yield % | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net profit (₹ Cr) | Qtr sales growth % | Qtr profit growth % | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Ica (India) | 29 | 15.4 | 10.8 | 7.8 | 0.67 | 0.0 | 87 | 2 | 27.1 | −47.7 | vs TIJARIA |
| Aik Pipes & Polymers | 20 | 206.6 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 0.34 | 0.0 | 9 | 0 | −18.1 | 1,266.7 | vs TIJARIA |
| Command Polymers | 19 | 37.0 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 0.88 | 0.0 | 11 | 1 | 279.3 | 855.0 | vs TIJARIA |
| Manas Polymers and Energies | 18 | 2.2 | 30.2 | 35.8 | 0.54 | 0.0 | 53 | 9 | 106.3 | 80.2 | vs TIJARIA |
| Tijaria Polypipes | 18 | — | −1.9 | — | — | 0.0 | 0 | −1 | — | — | — |
| Kunststoffe Industries | 18 | 10.2 | 17.2 | 13.9 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 12 | 2 | 4.3 | 95.5 | vs TIJARIA |
| L.K.Mehta Polymers | 16 | 25.2 | 7.9 | 5.6 | 0.88 | 0.0 | 29 | 1 | 17.5 | −5.9 | vs TIJARIA |
| Noble Polymers | 14 | — | −26.5 | −29.1 | 0.08 | 0.0 | 0 | −2 | — | — | vs TIJARIA |
| Ahimsa Industries | 14 | — | −5.9 | −6.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0 | −1 | −100.0 | — | vs TIJARIA |
| JMG Corporation | 14 | — | −13.5 | −16.0 | 0.13 | 0.0 | 1 | −1 | −80.3 | −139.0 | vs TIJARIA |
| SMVD Poly Pack | 13 | 0.4 | 5.0 | — | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0 | 30 | — | — | vs TIJARIA |
| Peer median | 18 | 15.4 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 0.23 | 0.0 | 9 | 1 | 10.9 | 80.2 |
Listed companies closest to Tijaria Polypipes in Plastic Products - Industrial include Alfa Ica (India), Aik Pipes & Polymers, Command Polymers, Manas Polymers and Energies, Kunststoffe Industries, L.K.Mehta Polymers, Noble Polymers, Ahimsa Industries.
Alfa Ica (India), with a market cap of ₹29.20 Cr.
Tijaria Polypipes' return on capital employed is −1.9%, below the peer median of 3.5%.