TRANSWORLD SHIPPING LINES (TRANSWORLD)₹237.39+19.99%Shipping
TRANSWORLD SHIPPING LINES is compared with the 9 closest in size in Shipping (14 companies in the industry). It has a ROCE of −5.0% against a peer median of 5.8%, and latest-quarter sales growth of −26.2% against a peer median of 12.5%. By market cap it is #4 of 10 in this set.
As of · Peer set: 9 closest in size in Shipping
| Company | M-cap (₹ Cr) | P/E | ROCE % | ROE % | Debt / equity | Div. yield % | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net profit (₹ Cr) | Qtr sales growth % | Qtr profit growth % | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shipping Corporation of India | 12,178 | 7.5 | 14.0 | 15.5 | 0.29 | 2.9 | 5,801 | 1,352 | 40.4 | 75.0 | vs TRANSWORLD |
| Seamec | 3,881 | 15.1 | 20.0 | 21.8 | 0.27 | 0.1 | 950 | 254 | 40.8 | 6.6 | vs TRANSWORLD |
| ABS Marine Services | 706 | 8.8 | 21.0 | 29.5 | 1.22 | 0.0 | 319 | 81 | 83.0 | 157.9 | vs TRANSWORLD |
| TRANSWORLD SHIPPING LINES | 522 | — | −5.0 | −10.8 | 0.45 | 0.0 | 546 | −75 | −26.2 | — | — |
| Essar Shipping | 343 | 3.8 | −208.0 | — | — | 0.0 | 2 | −112 | −100.0 | 752.3 | vs TRANSWORLD |
| Sadhav Shipping | 170 | 11.5 | 9.0 | 14.7 | 0.81 | 0.0 | 98 | 15 | — | — | vs TRANSWORLD |
| Garware Offshore Services | 118 | — | −6.0 | −12.6 | 0.60 | 0.0 | 36 | −9 | 60.0 | −2,063.2 | vs TRANSWORLD |
| Chowgule Steamships | 73 | — | 2.5 | −0.3 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 3 | −0 | −15.4 | −473.9 | vs TRANSWORLD |
| Fly-Hi Maritime Travels | 55 | 4.6 | 49.8 | 61.3 | 0.73 | 0.0 | 62 | 8 | — | — | vs TRANSWORLD |
| ARVIND PORT AND INFRA | 51 | 42.8 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 13 | 1 | −36.3 | −82.9 | vs TRANSWORLD |
| Peer median | 256 | 8.8 | 5.8 | 14.7 | 0.45 | 0.0 | 80 | 5 | 12.5 | 6.6 |
Listed companies closest to TRANSWORLD SHIPPING LINES in Shipping include Shipping Corporation of India, Seamec, ABS Marine Services, Essar Shipping, Sadhav Shipping, Garware Offshore Services, Chowgule Steamships, Fly-Hi Maritime Travels.
Shipping Corporation of India, with a market cap of ₹12,178 Cr.
TRANSWORLD SHIPPING LINES' return on capital employed is −5.0%, below the peer median of 5.8%.