Loading…
Two International funds side by side: returns, costs, size, risk and how much their portfolios overlap.
Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund vs Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund, as of 6 Nov 2026: Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund NAV ₹60.69, 3Y CAGR 17.8%, expense ratio 0.75%; Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund NAV ₹11.06, 3Y CAGR 16.6%, expense ratio 0.57%; about 0% of their portfolios overlap.
As of · Source: AMFI NAVs and fund-house disclosures
| Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund Direct Growth | Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | International | International |
| Fund house | Edelweiss Mutual Fund | Axis Mutual Fund |
| Plan | Direct Plan · Growth | Direct Plan · Growth Option |
| NAV | ₹60.69 (6 Nov 2026) | ₹11.06 (6 Nov 2026) |
| 1Y return | 2.7% | 4.6% |
| 3Y CAGR | 17.8% | 16.6% |
| 5Y CAGR | 2.4% | 4.9% |
| Since launch (CAGR) | 11.3% | 1.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.57% |
| AUM | ₹2,507 cr | ₹3,494 cr |
| Risk-o-meter | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | MSCI Golden Dragon Index | MSCI Golden Dragon Index |
| Exit load | Entry Load - NIL. Exit Load - Within 12 months from the date of allotment in respect of purchase made other than through SIP - 1%. Within 24 months from the date of allotment in respect of first purchase made through SIP - 1% | Entry Load: N. A. Exit Load: If redeemed / switched-out within 12 months from the date of allotment - 4 Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund For 10% of investment: Nil For remaining investment: 1% If redeemed/switched out after 12 months from the date of allotment: Nil |
| Minimum SIP | ₹100 | ₹100 |
| Holdings | 2 | 1 |
| Top 10 holdings weight | 97.8% | 98.8% |
| Portfolio overlap | About 0% by weight, from the latest disclosed holdings | |
Returns are point-to-point for each plan, after its expense ratio; periods over one year are CAGR. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Open in the compare tool: growth charts, SIP outcomes and shared holdings →Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund has the higher 5-year CAGR (as of 6 Nov 2026): Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund 2.4% a year vs Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund 4.9% a year. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund costs less: Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund charges 0.75% a year and Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund 0.57% a year.
Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund is larger: Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore Fund manages ₹2,507 cr and Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund ₹3,494 cr (as of 6 Nov 2026).
About 0% of their portfolios overlap by weight (the smaller weight of each common holding, summed), from the latest disclosed holdings.
Both are rated "Very High" on SEBI's risk-o-meter.
We don't give recommendations. Jivani Markets is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser or research analyst. Whether a fund suits you depends on your goals, horizon and risk appetite; speak to a SEBI-registered investment adviser or an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor before investing.
Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Returns are for Direct plans, after expenses (TER is already in the NAV). Research, not advice: we do not say a fund suits you. Disclaimer