Loading…
Two International funds side by side: returns, costs, size, risk and how much their portfolios overlap.
Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund vs ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund, as of 6 Nov 2026: Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund NAV ₹11.06, 3Y CAGR 16.6%, expense ratio 0.57%; ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund NAV ₹22.08, 3Y CAGR 26.3%, expense ratio 0.63%; about 0% of their portfolios overlap.
As of · Source: AMFI NAVs and fund-house disclosures
| Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund Direct Growth | ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | International | International |
| Fund house | Axis Mutual Fund | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund |
| Plan | Direct Plan · Growth Option | Direct Plan · Growth |
| NAV | ₹11.06 (6 Nov 2026) | ₹22.08 (6 Nov 2026) |
| 1Y return | 4.6% | 14.0% |
| 3Y CAGR | 16.6% | 26.3% |
| 5Y CAGR | 4.9% | 16.1% |
| Since launch (CAGR) | 1.8% | 16.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.63% |
| AUM | ₹3,494 cr | ₹3,738 cr |
| Risk-o-meter | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | MSCI Golden Dragon Index | — |
| Exit load | Entry Load: N. A. Exit Load: If redeemed / switched-out within 12 months from the date of allotment - 4 Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund For 10% of investment: Nil For remaining investment: 1% If redeemed/switched out after 12 months from the date of allotment: Nil | Nil The Trustees shall have a right to prescribe or modify the exit load structure with prospective effect subject to a maximum prescribed under the Regulations. |
| Minimum SIP | ₹100 | — |
| Holdings | 1 | 101 |
| Top 10 holdings weight | 98.8% | 46.8% |
| Portfolio overlap | About 0% by weight, from the latest disclosed holdings | |
Returns are point-to-point for each plan, after its expense ratio; periods over one year are CAGR. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Open in the compare tool: growth charts, SIP outcomes and shared holdings →ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund has the higher 5-year CAGR (as of 6 Nov 2026): Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund 4.9% a year vs ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund 16.1% a year. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund costs less: Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund charges 0.57% a year and ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund 0.63% a year.
ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund is larger: Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund manages ₹3,494 cr and ICICI Prudential NASDAQ 100 Index Fund ₹3,738 cr (as of 6 Nov 2026).
About 0% of their portfolios overlap by weight (the smaller weight of each common holding, summed), from the latest disclosed holdings.
Both are rated "Very High" on SEBI's risk-o-meter.
We don't give recommendations. Jivani Markets is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser or research analyst. Whether a fund suits you depends on your goals, horizon and risk appetite; speak to a SEBI-registered investment adviser or an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor before investing.
Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Returns are for Direct plans, after expenses (TER is already in the NAV). Research, not advice: we do not say a fund suits you. Disclaimer