Naman Industries Proxima (NAMAN)₹40.75−4.00%Furniture, Home Furnishing
Naman Industries Proxima is compared with the 10 closest in size in Furniture, Home Furnishing (25 companies in the industry). It has a ROCE of 0.0% against a peer median of 6.9%, and latest-quarter sales growth of −16.8% against a peer median of −25.0%. By market cap it is #4 of 11 in this set.
As of · Peer set: 10 closest in size in Furniture, Home Furnishing
| Company | M-cap (₹ Cr) | P/E | ROCE % | ROE % | Debt / equity | Div. yield % | Sales (₹ Cr) | Net profit (₹ Cr) | Qtr sales growth % | Qtr profit growth % | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marvel Decor | 110 | 25.6 | 7.8 | 6.8 | 0.32 | 0.0 | 69 | 4 | −2.1 | 44.6 | vs NAMAN |
| Sham Foam | 101 | 8.5 | 45.6 | 51.6 | 0.19 | 0.0 | 92 | 9 | — | — | vs NAMAN |
| TNA Solutions | 86 | 6.6 | 27.0 | 32.7 | 1.28 | 0.0 | 103 | 10 | — | — | vs NAMAN |
| Naman Industries Proxima | 53 | — | 0.0 | −2.9 | 0.30 | 0.0 | 143 | −2 | −16.8 | −402.0 | — |
| Omfurn India | 53 | 8.5 | 14.1 | 10.1 | 0.16 | 0.0 | 86 | 6 | 22.1 | 36.5 | vs NAMAN |
| Ahlada Engineers | 47 | 516.9 | 3.0 | 0.1 | 0.28 | 0.0 | 101 | 0 | −33.2 | −207.1 | vs NAMAN |
| Priti International | 39 | 46.2 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 26 | 1 | −62.0 | −80.7 | vs NAMAN |
| Rexpro Enterprises | 34 | 15.4 | 5.3 | 3.5 | 0.25 | 0.0 | 74 | 2 | −49.9 | −92.0 | vs NAMAN |
| Tirupati Foam | 28 | 14.2 | 8.8 | 5.7 | 1.07 | 1.6 | 95 | 2 | −12.0 | −18.0 | vs NAMAN |
| Milestone Furniture | 24 | — | −1.9 | −2.0 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 0 | −0 | — | — | vs NAMAN |
| Lexus Granito (India) | 23 | 19.9 | 6.9 | 9.2 | 3.06 | 0.0 | 62 | 1 | −45.0 | −224.5 | vs NAMAN |
| Peer median | 47 | 15.4 | 6.9 | 5.7 | 0.28 | 0.0 | 86 | 2 | −25.0 | −86.4 |
Listed companies closest to Naman Industries Proxima in Furniture, Home Furnishing include Marvel Decor, Sham Foam, TNA Solutions, Omfurn India, Ahlada Engineers, Priti International, Rexpro Enterprises, Tirupati Foam.
Marvel Decor, with a market cap of ₹110 Cr.
Naman Industries Proxima's return on capital employed is 0.0%, below the peer median of 6.9%.